If I thought my brain was exploding before, it certainly is now. I was unable to make a connection on Tuesday night to Elluminate and so I had to listen to the recorded version this morning. Sylvia Martinez certainly gave me some food for thought. I am not a gamer! I really have a strong feeling of negativity when it comes to video games and me playing them. I am surrounded by gamers in my family and I know that my students are avid gamers. I do support gaming as an activity for other people. When my 11 year old son asks me to watch him do something cool on a video game, I can even get feeling nauseous from the fast action-Good grief!
I am not sure that I have noticed the “hot” debate about video games, mainly because my mind has been occupied with other educational debates. When I stopped to think about it, I realized that there is a debate out there. I had a couple of thoughts on why we are having the debate.
1. We cannot deny the movement and the necessity of 21 century learning and engaging children in their learning by giving students what they need and want. I happened to come across a very interesting video at google videos this morning, School Matters: The Games Children Play, that I attempted to include in this post without any luck, so a link will have to do. It made a lot of the same points as Sylvia Martinez presented to ECI831, with some other issues added on. Dr. Henry Jenkins, Director of Comparitive Media Studies at MIT, said the following:
“If you ask a child what is bad about a video game, they will reply, ‘when it is too easy’. If you ask a child what is bad about an assignment, they will reply, “when is it too hard.” Dr. Jenkins felt that this summed up a fundamental problem with our teaching strategies and felt, as Sylvia Martinez did, that we need to try harder to link video game attributes to things that students are doing in the classroom.
2. Many teachers and parents do not see the educational value to gaming in school. Sylvia Martinez brought up an interesting point when she said, just because something is labeled ‘educational’ doesn’t mean that it is. Of course we all know we can’t believe everything that we read, but do we really stop and think about what we are actually trying to achieve with our “teaching” activities? I think parents and teachers can be lulled into thinking that we are spending “useful” time if something is labeled “educational”. The other side of that, I guess is, does everything we are doing have to be educational? Again it comes back to our definition of education and what we are trying to achieve. We need to be a lot more aware of what the game “says” it does and what we are actually hoping to achieve by having our students play the game.
3. There seems to be a lot of media hype on the issue of violence in video games and what effect that has on young children. Of course there are two sides to this debate as well, but the connection does not help when it comes to educating parents on the benefits of the use games in school other than the “educationally” labeled games.
4. The link between the amount of time children spend on playing video games/social media networks and childhood obesity is another topic of debate. You do not have to look far to see many headlines on this topic. Video games and other sedentary activities get an automatic bad rap. Schools are under pressure to add in more physical education and get those kids moving and this can help create a negative attitude toward using video games at school.
5. There is a debate about the rise of video games causing the death of reading, and reading is one of the number one factors that is linked to student success. According to James Gee, Professor of Education at the University of Wisconson, also seen the the video, “School Matters: The Games Children Play” …video gaming and other social media activities actually cause students to do more reading and writing than ever before, it is just the modes have changed and are not looking the same as our traditional ideas of what constitutes reading and writing.
I had never really thought about the creating side of games before, mainly because I am not a game player and not hugely comfortable with activities that I perceive require huge amounts of technical ability. I checked out the Scratch game creating site and even though I did not have much time to spend there, I realized, once again, that there are so many tools available that I am not taking advantage of. It is funny how everything starts to connect-we are moving toward student controlled learning and it makes sense that designing games puts the learner in charge.
One thing is for sure, the debate will probably continue. Schools need to work hard to educate parents on gaming by putting forth positive examples. It meshes so well with all the other changes and debates that are going on right now, that we have a great opportunity to be proactive in squashing some of the negative hype. Catch you on the back channel.